Skip to main content
Author(s): @SteffenDE

​
Elevator pitch

What are you proposing to change?
We propose adding the ability to stop active sessions. This allows the agent to free up any memory and threads/subprocesses associated with that session.

​
Status quo

How do things work today and what problems does this cause? Why would we change things?
Today, if you start a session, it will remain active until the ACP process is terminated. This means that if the agent implements sessions as separate processes, active users with many sessions can end up with a lot of processes unnecessarily using up system memory. Even if the agent does not spawn separate processes, memory used by large tool results or similar could still accumulate over time. The only way to free up that memory is to terminate the whole ACP process, which will stop all sessions and - if the agent does not support resuming sessions (load / resume / fork) - lead to a bad user experience.

​
What we propose to do about it

What are you proposing to improve the situation?
Add a new session/stop method. If supported, the agent must cancel any ongoing work related to the session (treat it as if session/cancel was called) and then free up any resources associated with the session.

​
Shiny future

How will things will play out once this feature exists?
Clients can track what sessions are actively used by a user and automatically stop old sessions.

​
Implementation details and plan

Tell me more about your implementation. What is your detailed implementation plan?
We propose to add a new "session/stop" method. Agents must declare this option is available by returning session: { stop : {} } in their capabilities. The object is reserved to declare future capabilities. Then the client would be able to stop a specific session with: 
{
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "id": 1,
  "method": "session/stop",
  "params": {
    "sessionId": "sess_789xyz"
  }
}
Agents might reply with an error if the session is not active or does not exist.

​
Frequently asked questions

What questions have arisen over the course of authoring this document or during subsequent discussions?
None so far.

​
What alternative approaches did you consider, and why did you settle on this one?

It could be an agent specific custom method, since we mainly ran into problems with Claude Code, but even for agents that don’t spawn full subprocesses for sessions, cleaning up unneeded sessions still seems like a good idea.

​
Revision history

2026-02-24: Initial draft